M-Wakili

Cheques Act Cap 35 - as Plain Text by MWakili

LAWS OF KENYA CHEQUES ACT CHAPTER 35 Revised Edition 2012 [1970] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev.

2012] CAP.

35 Cheques CHAPTER 35 CHEQUES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Interpretation.

3.

Protection of collecting banker.

4.

Protection of paying banker.

5.

Saving.

6.

Amendment of section 60 of Cap.

27.

7.

Replacement of sections 82 and 83 of Cap.

27.

3 [Issue 1] [Rev.

2012] CAP.

35 Cheques CHAPTER 35 CHEQUES ACT [Date of assent: 26th June, 1968.] [Date of commencement: 28th July, 1968.] An Act of Parliament to make further provision in regard to the payment of cheques and certain other instruments [Act No.

2 of 2002.] 1.

Short title This Act may be cited as the Cheques Act.

2.

Interpretation (1) In this Act payee does not include an endorsee under a special endorsement; prescribed instrument means (a) a cheque, including a cheque which either under section 81A of the Bills of Exchange Act (Cap.

27.) or otherwise is not transferable; or (b) a document issued by a customer of a banker which is not a bill of exchange but is intended to enable a person to obtain payment from the banker of the sum of money specified in the document; or (c) a draft drawn by a banker upon himself and payable on demand at an office of his bank; or (d) any other instrument which the Minister for the time being responsible for finance may specify by notice in the Gazette.

(2) Subject to subsection (1) of this section, this Act shall be read and construed as one with the Bills of Exchange Act (Cap.27).

[Act No.

2 of 2002, Sch.] 3.

Protection of collecting banker (1) A banker who gives value for, or has a lien on, a cheque payable to order which the payee delivers to him for collection either without endorsing it or without endorsing it regularly has such rights, if any, as he would have had if upon delivery the payee had endorsed it regularly in blank.

(2) Where a banker, in good faith and without negligence and in the ordinary course of business (a) receives payment for a customer of a prescribed instrument to which the customer has no title or has a defective title; or (b) having credited the customers account with the amount of a prescribed instrument to which the customer has no title or a defective title, receives payment of the instrument for himself, the banker does not incur any liability to the true owner of the instrument by reason only of his having received payment of it; and a banker is not to be 5 [Issue 1] CAP.

35 [Rev.

2012] Cheques treated for the purposes of this subsection as having been negligent by reason only that he has failed to concern himself with the absence of, or irregularity in, endorsement of a prescribed instrument of which the customer in question appears to be the payee.

4.

Protection of paying banker (1) Where a banker, in good faith and in the ordinary course of business, pays a prescribed instrument drawn on him to a banker, he does not in doing so incur any liability by reason only of the absence of, or irregularity in, endorsement of the instrument, and (a) in the case of a cheque, he is deemed to have paid it in due course; and (b) in the case of any other prescribed instrument, the payment discharges the instrument.

(2) A prescribed instrument which is not endorsed but which appears to have been paid by the banker on whom it is drawn is evidence that the payee has been paid by the banker the sum of money specified in the instrument.

5.

Saving Nothing in this Act makes negotiable an instrument which apart from this Act is not negotiable.

6.

Amendment of section 60 of Cap.

27 Section 60(1) of the Bills of Exchange Act is amended by adding at the end thereof the words ;and in this subsection bill payable to order on demand includes a prescribed instrument within the meaning of the Cheques Act, 1968 which is payable to order 7.

Replacement of sections 82 and 83 of Cap.

27 The Bills of Exchange Act (No.

41 of 1968) is amended by substituting for sections 82 and 83 thereof a new section as follows 82.

Provisions as to crossed cheques to apply to certain other instruments The foregoing provisions of this Part relating to the crossing of cheques and crossed cheques shall apply in relation to a prescribed instrument within the meaning of the Cheques Act, 1968 (not being a cheque) as they apply to a cheque.

[Issue 1] 6.

Frequently asked questions

What is M-Wakili?

M-Wakili (Wakili AI) is an advanced AI-driven legal aide proficient in interpreting Kenyan law.
This tool is useful for lawyers, law students, and the public, providing exhaustive and concise solutions to legal issues.
M-Wakili is more than an information database, it dissects and analyzes legal documents, clarifying their essence and implications to answer queries accurately. Alongside its legal expertise, M-Wakili also produces persuasive written content.
The primary aim of M-Wakili is to provide world-class legal support to people from all walks of life, while also aiding the advancement of law professionals by enhancing research efficiency.
This innovative platform promises to revolutionize the legal field, enhancing the accessibility and effectiveness of legal expertise.

Will I get immediate answers to my legal questions 24/7?

Yes the service is available 24/7 and you will get answers to your legal questions within seconds.

How does M-Wakili work?

M-Wakili is a custom trained AI model that uses algorithms and machine learning to understand and answer a user's questions. It bases its responses on the existing Kenyan laws and regulations.

Is M-Wakili accurate?

Yes, M-Wakili is designed to provide accurate and reliable responses based on Kenyan Law and is considered more accurate than almost all AI models including ChatGPT. Additionally, it is constantly being updated and improved to ensure it is aware of the occurring changes in the laws and regulations.
If you find any model that is more accurate than M-Wakili, please let us know and we might give you a free subscription or a *refund. (We reserve the right to determine the accuracy of the model and if you should be given a refund or free subscription. Our terms and conditions apply.)

Who can use M-Wakili?

Everyone can use M-Wakili. Lawyers and law students can use it as a legal research tool, and the general public can use it to get answers to their legal queries.

How can I access M-Wakili?

You can access M-Wakili through our website. Just type in your question, and M-Wakili will provide the answers.

Is M-Wakili a substitute for a human lawyer?

No it cannot and will not be, M-Wakili is designed to assist and provide legal information and is great at that. However, there are still situations where the expertise and personal touch of a real lawyer is necessary, such as in court representation and negotiations.
Fun fact, most of our paying users are lawyers! They use M-Wakili to help them with legal research and analysis.

Is AI going to replace lawyers?

No. M-Wakili AI is great for helping real-life lawyers with legal work and assisting people in understanding legal problems, providing many ways how to handle them. However, AI cannot replace the human touch of a real lawyer. There are still situations where the expertise and personal touch of a real lawyer is necessary, such as in court representation and negotiations.
In fact, most of our paying users are lawyers! They are excited about the possibilities of AI in the legal industry and are leveraging it to save time and energy and focus on higher-level tasks.
AI can make the legal market more convenient for both sides by allowing real lawyers to focus on specialized services while using AI to handle certain tasks.

Is my data secure with M-Wakili?

Yes, we prioritize user data privacy and have implemented strict measures to ensure that your data is secure.

Can M-Wakili represent me in court?

Not yet, M-Wakili cannot represent you in court. It can help you understand the law and your legal situation, but you will need a human lawyer for court representation.

Do I need to pay for M-Wakili services?

Currently, we offer basic features for free while premium services require a subscription fee. Please visit our pricing page for more details.

How can M-Wakili help law students?

M-Wakili can assist law students in learning and practicing their legal research and analysis skills. It may also offer insights into current legal trends and issues, helping prepare them for their future in law.

What does "HHH" mean?

Helpful, Honest, and Harmless (HHH) are three components of building AI systems (like M-Wakili) that are aligned with people’s interests.
- Helpful: M-Wakili wants to genuinely help the user
- Honest: M-Wakili shares information it believes to be true, and avoids made-up information
- Harmless: M-Wakili will not cooperate in aiding the user in harmful activities or lead the user to harms way